AMERICA’S EXPLANATION OF THE UNIVERSE. -39*
Posted in Uncategorized by Baba - Jun 12, 2015
America’s public schools can only legally teach Evolution and the Big Bang. So a typical High School graduate has been taught, exclusively, the following explanation for the existence of the Universe:
“NOTHING EXPLODED FOR NO REASON AND THUS WE HAVE THE UNIVERSE.”
Not surprisingly there is another explanation. It is called “Creation”. It is unlawful in America.
Creation does not require submission to a religion or a book. It simply requires compliance to the Scientific Method. It leads perfectly logically to the necessary conclusion that the Universe is the result of the purposeful, non-random, application of power in a way far more systematic and predictable than “NOTHING EXPLODED FOR NO REASON.”
Sadly, the only explanation that is accepted and deemed legal does not conform to the requirements of Science. To illustrate the failure to comply to the Scientific Method here are 7 selected quotes from esteemed scientists:
“In spite of nearly a century of work there is still no unanimity in regard to the details of the means of evolution.”1
“Evolution is baseless and quite incredible.”2
“ It is our duty is to destroy the myth of evolution. Biologists must think about the weaknesses and extrapolations put forward as truth. They purposely overlook reality and refuse to acknowledge the inadequacies and falsity of their beliefs.”3
“It is not the duty of science to defend the theory of evolution no matter which illogical and unsupported conclusions it offers. On the contrary, it is expected that scientists recognize the patently obvious impossibility of Darwin’s pronouncements and predictions.4
” Scientists who go about teaching that evolution is a fact of life are great con men, and the story they are telling the greatest hoax ever. We do not have one iota of fact but only a tangled mishmash of guessing games and figure juggling.”5
“Evolution is perhaps unique among theories in that its acceptance is not that there is evidence of it, but that any other [Creationism] interpretation is incredible.”6
“Scientists have no proof that life was not the result of an act of creation.”7
1—*Richard Goldschmidt, “Evolution, as Viewed by One Geneticist,” in American Scientist, Vol. 409, January 1952, p. 84.
2-*Ambrose Flemming, president, British Association for Advancement of Science, in The Unleashing of Evolutionary Thought.
3—*Pierre-Paul Grasse, Evolution of Living Organisms (1977), p. 8.
4—*L.L. Cohen, Darwin Was Wrong: A Study in Probabilities (1985).
5—*Fresno Bee, August 20, 1959, p. 1-B [quoting *T.N. Tahmisian, physiologist for the Atomic Energy Commission].
6—*Charles Singer, A Short History of Science to the Nineteenth Century, 1941.
7—*Robert Jastrow, The Enchanted Loom: Mind in the Universe (1981), p. 19.
*in MENU select THE LIST to decipher number
COMMENTS